<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Around the Corner | Comments</title><description><br>Innovation in the Business of Government: A GSA Blog </description><link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:04:12 AM -0400</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:04:12 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ugg boots sale</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Great article - very detailed and interesting .]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Great article - very detailed and interesting .]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#14112009030412IONCN7.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:06:31 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carolyn Barranca</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It doesn't surprise me that those most inclined to use the new media are those who are least afraid of the technology. Seven or eight years ago the demographics for government websites also showed that the most prolific and successful users were younger tech savvy professionals. But if the medium is truly the messasge, then it's only a matter of time that the general public will realize the benefits of finding their own personalized resources via new media. It will evolve to more general audiences, just like the internet did. People will want real substance for the issues they are interested in.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It doesn't surprise me that those most inclined to use the new media are those who are least afraid of the technology. Seven or eight years ago the demographics for government websites also showed that the most prolific and successful users were younger tech savvy professionals. But if the medium is truly the messasge, then it's only a matter of time that the general public will realize the benefits of finding their own personalized resources via new media. It will evolve to more general audiences, just like the internet did. People will want real substance for the issues they are interested in.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#11042009120631PMIONP95.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:56:00 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gold</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I like the point about twitter's audience being technology oriented - different social media networks attract users with different interests. I have a tumblr, which is a tumblog community that allows you to post photos and videos really easily, as well as interact with other community members. A lot of other users are really concerned about health care and there is healthy debate on it. Twitter is the medium getting a lot of attention right now, but not a place I have seen too much healthcare discussion because, like you say, the issue may be too large and nuanced to talk about in 140 characters.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like the point about twitter's audience being technology oriented - different social media networks attract users with different interests. I have a tumblr, which is a tumblog community that allows you to post photos and videos really easily, as well as interact with other community members. A lot of other users are really concerned about health care and there is healthy debate on it. Twitter is the medium getting a lot of attention right now, but not a place I have seen too much healthcare discussion because, like you say, the issue may be too large and nuanced to talk about in 140 characters.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#10282009125600PMIONP2K.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>re: Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:58:53 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Casey Coleman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[You may have put up a test comment to see how long it takes to get posted. I have to review them first, per the usage policy, so it's not immediate. I try to look at the comments frequently but appreciate your patience if I don't get to it right away.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You may have put up a test comment to see how long it takes to get posted. I have to review them first, per the usage policy, so it's not immediate. I try to look at the comments frequently but appreciate your patience if I don't get to it right away.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#10272009075853AMCCOG3F.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:05:25 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[test]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[test]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#10232009100525AMIONKPX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>re: Productive in Place</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:11:07 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Casey Coleman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Productive in Place</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Michael, I'd like that. Let's find a time to visit soon.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks, Michael, I'd like that. Let's find a time to visit soon.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Productive-in-Place?opendocument&amp;comments#10222009031107PMCCOQHL.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Productive in Place</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:35:12 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Atkinson</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Productive in Place</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[10 years ago I developed a project for the 7th floor of GSA HQ called the Adaptable Workplace Lab (AWL). We packed it full of innovative features that remain today. <br /><br />Though the AWL has been largely ignored by GSA since initial occupancy, it's design and planning implications simply may not have been understood at the time. <br /><br />Perhaps we need to revisit the AWL and glean those important lessons while we still can. I'd be happy to be your tour guide or discuss the project further with you.<br /><br />It has a lot to offer.<br /><br />MA]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[10 years ago I developed a project for the 7th floor of GSA HQ called the Adaptable Workplace Lab (AWL). We packed it full of innovative features that remain today. <br /><br />Though the AWL has been largely ignored by GSA since initial occupancy, it's design and planning implications simply may not have been understood at the time. <br /><br />Perhaps we need to revisit the AWL and glean those important lessons while we still can. I'd be happy to be your tour guide or discuss the project further with you.<br /><br />It has a lot to offer.<br /><br />MA]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Productive-in-Place?opendocument&amp;comments#10212009023512PMIONQYK.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Productive in Place</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:14:27 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Atkinson</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Productive in Place</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[10 years ago, I created a project on the 7th floor of GSA HQ called the Adaptable Workplace Lab. We filled it with innovative features and it remains so today, though it's been largely ignored by GSA since initial occupancy. <br /><br />Although the agency may not have understood it's implications then, this project still can teach many lessons for those wanting to learn them. <br /><br />Perhaps it's time to revisit that space and glean the knowledge invested there. I'd be happy to be your tour guide or discuss the project further. It has a lot to offer. <br /><br />MA]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[10 years ago, I created a project on the 7th floor of GSA HQ called the Adaptable Workplace Lab. We filled it with innovative features and it remains so today, though it's been largely ignored by GSA since initial occupancy. <br /><br />Although the agency may not have understood it's implications then, this project still can teach many lessons for those wanting to learn them. <br /><br />Perhaps it's time to revisit that space and glean the knowledge invested there. I'd be happy to be your tour guide or discuss the project further. It has a lot to offer. <br /><br />MA]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Productive-in-Place?opendocument&amp;comments#10212009021427PMIONQKL.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:08:11 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>James White </dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Diplomacy and New Media: A Rich Conversation Between James Fallows and John Podesta at Gov 2.0 Summit</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[We agree with new media. { <a href="http://www.webedesigner.com" target="_blank" title="Link: www.webedesigner.com">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We agree with new media. { <a href="http://www.webedesigner.com" target="_blank" title="Link: www.webedesigner.com">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Diplomacy-and-New-Media-A-Rich-Conversation-Between-James-Fallows-and-John-Podesta-at-Gov2.0-Summit?opendocument&amp;comments#10172009100811PMION5PN.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2009 06:55:43 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jonathan Burke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[More power to them and to the US. Competition is healthy and we need to pick up the pace and make #1 again. I believe that small business owners as well as the big corps play a huge role in competition and growth. Power to the entrepreneur.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More power to them and to the US. Competition is healthy and we need to pick up the pace and make #1 again. I believe that small business owners as well as the big corps play a huge role in competition and growth. Power to the entrepreneur.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/09222009043634PMRCMS6X.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10052009055543PMIONUVV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:10:33 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Logo Designer</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Nice post. Thank you so much for points.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nice post. Thank you so much for points.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/09222009043634PMRCMS6X.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10052009061033AMIONF56.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 03:49:54 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I haven't read this book but I've heard that it is a little dated since it was published seven years ago and primary talks about the web. <br /><br />I have read his most recent book, Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder; and it is wonderful. The concepts presented in 'Miscellaneous' have much relevance for IT professionals. <br /><br />For example, in a large enterprise how best can we find unstructured data? Most data, upwards of 80% to 90% is unstructured (Word docs, spreadsheets, presentation files, etc). Does a CIO force users to use structured network folders to store documents, or SharePoint team sites? What if we just dumped all of our documents into a big 'digital pile' and used 'tagging' and social bookmarks to allow information workers to find the data?<br /><br />-Neil<br /><br />{ <a href="http://michelangelo.com" target="_blank" title="Link: michelangelo.com">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I haven't read this book but I've heard that it is a little dated since it was published seven years ago and primary talks about the web. <br /><br />I have read his most recent book, Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder; and it is wonderful. The concepts presented in 'Miscellaneous' have much relevance for IT professionals. <br /><br />For example, in a large enterprise how best can we find unstructured data? Most data, upwards of 80% to 90% is unstructured (Word docs, spreadsheets, presentation files, etc). Does a CIO force users to use structured network folders to store documents, or SharePoint team sites? What if we just dumped all of our documents into a big 'digital pile' and used 'tagging' and social bookmarks to allow information workers to find the data?<br /><br />-Neil<br /><br />{ <a href="http://michelangelo.com" target="_blank" title="Link: michelangelo.com">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Management-Innovators-Bookshelf-Small-Pieces-Loosely-Joined-A-Unified-Theory-of-the-Web-by-David-Weinberger-2002?opendocument&amp;comments#10022009024954PMIONR9R.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Future of Management in the Knowledge Economy</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:32:34 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>discount car parts</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The Future of Management in the Knowledge Economy</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[very good content. thanks for the post!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[very good content. thanks for the post!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/The-Future-of-Management-in-the-Knowledge-Economy?opendocument&amp;comments#10022009103234AMIONL8W.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>re: Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:53:21 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Casey Coleman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Good point. Your comment reminds me of a book on fractals, "Chaos: Making a New Science," by James Gleick. I read it in the late '80s when it first came out and it really stayed with me. I should read it again, come to think of it...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good point. Your comment reminds me of a book on fractals, "Chaos: Making a New Science," by James Gleick. I read it in the late '80s when it first came out and it really stayed with me. I should read it again, come to think of it...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Management-Innovators-Bookshelf-Small-Pieces-Loosely-Joined-A-Unified-Theory-of-the-Web-by-David-Weinberger-2002?opendocument&amp;comments#09302009085321AMCCOH5F.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:20:23 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mart braden</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think, perhaps without him realizing it, Weinberger's Unified Theory of the Web reflects nature also... when we consider Fractal philosophy.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think, perhaps without him realizing it, Weinberger's Unified Theory of the Web reflects nature also... when we consider Fractal philosophy.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Management-Innovators-Bookshelf-Small-Pieces-Loosely-Joined-A-Unified-Theory-of-the-Web-by-David-Weinberger-2002?opendocument&amp;comments#09302009052023AMIONE5S.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:28:43 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Burkholder</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Are we really surprised by this? Switzerland throughout history has always been a strong economic power as has Sweden and Denmark. In a time of economic turmoil, bailouts and infusions thus increasing the deficit, the United States has to balance itself back out. I would think that next year, we will again rise to the top of the list.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are we really surprised by this? Switzerland throughout history has always been a strong economic power as has Sweden and Denmark. In a time of economic turmoil, bailouts and infusions thus increasing the deficit, the United States has to balance itself back out. I would think that next year, we will again rise to the top of the list.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/09222009043634PMRCMS6X.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09292009032843PMIONRZZ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>re: Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:34:11 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Casey Coleman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Great points, thanks for the perspective.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Great points, thanks for the perspective.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/09222009043634PMRCMS6X.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09292009083411AMCCOGRH.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:12:00 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Christian DE NEEF</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Back to Basics: US Competitiveness in 2010</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think that the criteria are debatable. A new ranking appears every few months, applying similar but slightly different criteria, and of course it will be different (with some occasional surprises). This being said, Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries, Singapore, and a few other (small countries) have consistently been performing well in the innovation rankings, and I have come to believe that this is rather good news for the US: I have no proof of this but it may be relatively easier for a small country to score higher than for a large behemoth. If that is true, then the position of the US is still very enviable... It would be more worrying if another large country - say China - would score in the top 10!<br /><br />@cdn]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think that the criteria are debatable. A new ranking appears every few months, applying similar but slightly different criteria, and of course it will be different (with some occasional surprises). This being said, Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries, Singapore, and a few other (small countries) have consistently been performing well in the innovation rankings, and I have come to believe that this is rather good news for the US: I have no proof of this but it may be relatively easier for a small country to score higher than for a large behemoth. If that is true, then the position of the US is still very enviable... It would be more worrying if another large country - say China - would score in the top 10!<br /><br />@cdn]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/09222009043634PMRCMS6X.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#09282009041200PMIONSV3.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:10:55 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Mick's perspective below is consistent with contemporary approaches to corporate governance. When the EA as Strategy team from the Sloan School developed its framework it recognized that it was the alignment of IT planning with an organization's operating model that was central to successful IT governance. The framework provides an IT governance body choice among diversification, replication, coordination and unification approaches. It is an error to assume that governance implies unification, especially where the organization's operating model is clearly grounded in diversification.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mick's perspective below is consistent with contemporary approaches to corporate governance. When the EA as Strategy team from the Sloan School developed its framework it recognized that it was the alignment of IT planning with an organization's operating model that was central to successful IT governance. The framework provides an IT governance body choice among diversification, replication, coordination and unification approaches. It is an error to assume that governance implies unification, especially where the organization's operating model is clearly grounded in diversification.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Management-Innovators-Bookshelf-Small-Pieces-Loosely-Joined-A-Unified-Theory-of-the-Web-by-David-Weinberger-2002?opendocument&amp;comments#09212009111055AMIONLYV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:01:36 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Management Innovator&#8217;s Bookshelf: Small Pieces, Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web by David Weinberger (2002)</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Is this a philosophical precept that may be adapted to governance of IT at GSA today? We are, after all, a federation of service offices, "loosely joined pieces" if you will. Our environments are akin, but unique. Each responsive to the individual mission and business imperatives of handed down by the EOP and the Congress. <br /><br />Can we innovate a new model that captures the idea of the "network of cooperation?" I believe we can and must build a model that abandons the rigid, hierarchical tradition of governance for a non-linear, adaptive environment wherein core principles inform individual solutions. If we cannot adapt, we will not succeed,]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is this a philosophical precept that may be adapted to governance of IT at GSA today? We are, after all, a federation of service offices, "loosely joined pieces" if you will. Our environments are akin, but unique. Each responsive to the individual mission and business imperatives of handed down by the EOP and the Congress. <br /><br />Can we innovate a new model that captures the idea of the "network of cooperation?" I believe we can and must build a model that abandons the rigid, hierarchical tradition of governance for a non-linear, adaptive environment wherein core principles inform individual solutions. If we cannot adapt, we will not succeed,]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://innovation.gsa.gov/blogs/OCIO.nsf/dx/Management-Innovators-Bookshelf-Small-Pieces-Loosely-Joined-A-Unified-Theory-of-the-Web-by-David-Weinberger-2002?opendocument&amp;comments#09172009110136AMIONLT3.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
